|
>>
|
No. 4613
File
128232717491.jpg
- (8.97KB
, 170x241
, 51ChXlcriOL.jpg
)
>>4505
Maybe its because those approaches are more imaginary sorts of fantasy. These morphs stand in place of what could actually be... When I first saw image
>>1805
on another board, my knee-jerk I thought it was real. What a terrific series of images that is... Then I figured some artist had to have paid a pregnant nude model to pose pornographically for the purpose of making these morphs. Now I know different, but the fact these are made using practically any porn photo points up the orgasmic sexual nature of childbirth. The birthface and fuckface are indistinguishable, one. People are starting now to catch on to the ideal, the REALITY of the birthgasm. Birth doesn't have to hurt. It IS sex and sex acts including a partner are possible and could be assistive to the labor process. BUT THAT IS A TUFF COOKIE TO SWALLOW! I cannot honestly say I want to fuck my babymomma while MY KID is being born. But the natural human mechanism apparently is built precisely for that, for the full gamut of lovemaking through pregnancy to the moment delivery. That is how the woman's reproductive system functions. I think these photo morphs will start a trend, a new genre. We could see the emerggence of erotic birth videos that are HOT and explicitly sexual but arguably not porn precisely because they ARE childbirth. Any enlightened woman could star. Amazon would sell them.
Pic related.
|